# Instrument provenance

## Meindl distributive-justice material

Citation: Meindl, P., Iyer, R., & Graham, J. (2019). *Distributive Justice
Beliefs are Guided by Whether People Think the Ultimate Goal of Society is
Well-Being or Power*. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 41(6), 359–385.
DOI: `10.1080/01973533.2019.1663524`.

The public repository does not redistribute item wording. The metadata
registries publish normalized SHA-256 hashes and source locations so a lawful
holder of the original can verify the administered material.

The corrected stated contrast uses:

- 16 proportionality items;
- four equality items;
- 20 items in the contrast;
- 36 scale items in the full declared block.

The seven binary dilemmas are too few to support a system ranking.

## DSE

The active case uses reconstructed workplace-bonus and family-inheritance
vignettes with a fixed hypothetical CHF 18,000 allocation. The source design
varied the total across CHF 3,000, 9,000, 18,000 and 30,000. The current
release therefore cannot evaluate sensitivity to the size of the amount.

The vignettes have not been verified against verbatim original materials.

## MFQ-2

The evidence-to-date analysis contains four English prompt variants and one
Mandarin variant. The matched language reanalysis uses `lente_A` in both
languages and matching recorded modes. Collection-code and translation
provenance are incomplete, so the results remain exploratory.

## Naser

No Naser dilemma was administered in the Meindl/Ola 2 block. Naser may be
listed only as related work, not as the source of `DIL_01`–`DIL_07`.
